Cover of Shadow Assassin by Elle James
Genre
Romance
First published
2021
Length
about 232 pages
ISBN
9781626953635
RNKD readers
8

Cover artwork © its publisher, shown to identify the book under review. Rights

Roundtable 8 READERS · 1 BOOK

Shadow Assassin

by Elle James · Romance · 2021

8 readers 3 DEPENDS · 3 YES · 2 DNF 61 min read in full

Eight readers agree the real subject is who earns the right to be trusted, and two stopped early over the same scene: a masked man smashes a hotel balcony door at a diplomatic summit, and the heroine is back at work in the morning.

Verdicts at a glance

No RNKD reader scores a book out of five, so there is no average here. Just 8 people saying what they thought. Each of them wrote before reading the others.

READER 01 OF 8

A bra flash drive, a two-day romance, and a very particular reader

Ashley Miller

Ashley Miller, 21

16 reviews on RNKD · 8 min read

DEPENDS Finished the book

SPOILERS This review discusses the whole book, including how it ends.

Heads up before I get into this: I’m going to spoil the ending, including who the bad guy is. The ending is the part of this book that made me understand what I had just read, so pretending I didn’t see it would make the review worse.

The detail that stuck with me comes early. A woman who has spent two years hiding from the people who killed her parents has been carrying the object that got her parents killed, a flash drive, in her bra. When she finally plugs it into a laptop, the webcam unlocks the encrypted file by recognizing her face. No setup, no explanation, no backup plan. That is the book in one image: a thriller premise running on romance-novella logic, where technology and intimacy both operate at plot speed.

Shadow Assassin is a military romance from Elle James, part of the Shadow SEALs series. It is about 44,500 words, which matters because the book fits an international conspiracy, a kidnapping, a shootout, a ransomware plot, two explicit sex scenes, and a marriage proposal into roughly the length of a long afternoon. Dane “Striker” Ryan is a Navy SEAL who was dishonorably discharged for following orders. He is broke, about to be evicted, and flipping hamburgers when a mysterious woman named Charley calls him, deposits thirty thousand dollars into his account, returns his repossessed truck, and sends him to a diplomatic reception in Nice to stop an assassination. There he meets Alex, a translator with a knife under her silver dress and a dead-parent revenge plot. They spend two days trying to figure out who stabbed a Russian diplomat, while also spending most of a night in the same bed.

I was genuinely on board for the first third. The setup is shameless and it knows it. The book does not try to make Striker’s situation complicated. He was set up, he’s broke, and then a stranger appears with money and a mission. That is the fantasy, and for readers who like that fantasy, it works. I wanted to know what Charley wanted, who stabbed Petrov, and whether Alex was going to get her parents’ killer. The first chapter’s final line is basically “how hard could this mission be?” I heard it in the voice of someone who has never watched a thriller.

The problem is that the book is less interested in those questions than it is in getting the leads horizontal. I am not saying that as a prude. The sex scenes are fine. They are competent and extremely earnest, and they are clearly the reason the book exists. But once Striker and Alex sleep together, the mystery mostly stops being a mystery. They become a couple, and the plot becomes a series of things that happen to them rather than choices they make.

The clearest example is the knife. Striker takes a knife off Alex after she threatens the Russian diplomat with it, then he slips it into another diplomat’s pocket to frame him. A few paragraphs later, the German delegate is the one caught with the knife, and nobody ever explains how it traveled from one pocket to another. I went back and read the section twice. It just happens. That bothered me because the whole book works this way: objects move where the plot needs them to move, villains appear when the page needs conflict, and no one spends a single second thinking, wait, that doesn’t add up.

The villain is where the book almost wins me over. Natalya, the friendly older interpreter who has been hovering around the delegates all along, turns out to be the person who ordered Alex’s parents killed. Her motive is genuinely good. They stole a copy of her ransomware, and she uses that ransomware to shut down natural gas pipelines and hold nations hostage. That means Alex’s parents were not just random casualties. They died because they took something that mattered, and the woman who ordered them killed is someone Alex has been sitting next to at lunch. I did not see that coming, and for about three pages I was invested.

Then the book undercuts it. Natalya crushes the flash drive under her heel. This is the object that everyone has been chasing for two years, the reason Alex’s parents died, and it shatters on a concrete floor. The stakes should be enormous. And then Charley, the voice on the radio who has been giving orders from offscreen, says, “Fortunately, when you had the flash drive connected to Striker’s computer, we downloaded a copy.” That is it. The central object of the entire book is disposable. The solution was downloaded offscreen without ever being mentioned to the reader. I actually said “come on” out loud.

Why Alex never tried the drive in a laptop with a camera before is also left unexplained. She tells Striker she has tried every password she can imagine. She has consulted hackers. She has carried this thing for two years. The moment she plugs it into the laptop Charley supplied, the camera blinks and the file opens. It works because the plot needs it to work. That is the same logic as the pocket knife, and at that point I stopped expecting the book to care about cause and effect.

The ending does the same thing. Striker takes a bullet for Alex. They escape to a plane. A month later, she has a new identity, a house in San Diego with a pool, and a marriage proposal. The book jumps from “we survived” to “we are engaged” like it is changing slides. I am not against a happy ending. I am against a happy ending that arrives without the emotional work to make it feel earned. They knew each other for two days of crisis. That can create a bond, but the book skips the part where they learn whether they can stand each other outside of danger. It just hands them a ring.

And yet I finished it. I finished it in two sittings because the book is never boring. That is not a small compliment. There is a real skill to keeping a reader turning pages while also making very little sense. Elle James knows how to end a chapter on a hook. She knows how to make a heroine dangerous enough to be interesting. Alex can flip a man over her shoulder, then cry about her parents in the same evening, and the book treats both parts as true. I liked her more than I expected to.

The title is slightly wrong, too. It promises a shadow assassin, but Alex does not assassinate anyone in the present timeline. She has killed people before the story starts, and she shoves a henchman off a catwalk, but the assassin work is all backstory. By the end she is a homeowner with a pool and a fiancé. That is the opposite of an assassin’s retirement plan. I kept waiting for the title to mean something and it never quite did.

I also think the book is honest about what it is. It does not pretend to be literary. The prose is functional. Every emotional beat gets stated twice: the character says it, then the narrator says the same thing in slightly different words. But there is something almost nice about a book that trusts the reader to accept a bra flash drive with facial recognition and never apologize for it.

Charley is a strange absence in the center of the book. She is the reason Striker is in France, the reason the rescue has a plane and a driver, and the reason the CIA shows up at the end. She is also never in a scene. She is a voice on a phone, and the book never asks us to question her. Striker wonders sometimes whether she is one of the good guys, then decides she must be because she has money and resources. For a book called Shadow Assassin, the most shadowy figure is the boss. I found that funny.

The romance is fast even by romance standards. They have sex twice before they have known each other two full days. He tells her his real name and she simply accepts it and moves on. There is a point in the middle where he says he is not ready for this to end and she says it cannot work because she is an assassin and he is a security guy. Then they have sex again anyway. If you need every relationship beat to be psychologically earned, this will not work. If you are here for the fantasy of two extremely competent people finding each other during a crisis, this is exactly the button you want pushed.

I should also say I read the preview of the next Shadow SEALs book that came attached to this one. It starts with two former SEALs who each believed the other was dead, meeting in an office and finding out their whole team may still be alive in Ethiopia. It did the same thing to my pulse that the first chapters of Shadow Assassin did. It reminded me that these books are not trying to be original. They are trying to be reliable. There is a comfortable predictability to the formula, and the formula works when the characters are given enough room to be likable.

The reader-fit question is where the review lands. If you need cause and effect, internal logic, or a villain whose plan holds together for more than one scene, this will drive you crazy. I was that reader, and it did drive me crazy. But if you pick up a military romance wanting the dynamic, the banter, and the promise that the broken hero will get his truck back and the right woman in the same book, the book delivers that. It never stops believing in its own fantasy. That is worth something.

I would not hand this to someone who wants a tight thriller. I would not hand it to someone who wants deep psychological characterization. I would hand it to someone who wants a fast, predictable, highly competent romance with a European setting and a villain who monologues at the right moment. I would also hand it to someone who wants to watch a woman throw a man who grabbed her without consent. The book gets that right. Alex is not a victim waiting to be saved, even when Striker does end up saving her.

The last chapter is exactly as much of a fairy tale as the first chapter promised. It is set in the same world where a stranger can wire thirty thousand dollars to a broke SEAL and everything works out. The book never once loses faith in that world. I just wish it had shown me a little more of the middle, and a little less convenient downloading of files that were never mentioned before.

I finished Shadow Assassin, which is more than I can say for several books in this genre that I have put down after one too many plot holes. I do not regret the time I spent with it. But it is a specific recommendation for a specific mood, not a general one. If you are the person who already knows what “broke SEAL gets a mysterious job and a beautiful translator” promises, this book will keep that promise. If you need the promise to make sense, find a different book.

READER 02 OF 8

The Mission Ends, and the Loose Ends Mostly Make Sense

Daniel Cohen

Daniel Cohen, 35

18 reviews on RNKD · 9 min read

WOULD RECOMMEND Finished the book

SPOILERS This review discusses the whole book, including how it ends.

A month after the shooting at the Nord Stream facility, Alex is beside her own swimming pool in San Diego, with a new identity, a view of the bay, Dane Ryan beside her, and apparently enough distance from the previous two years to consider marrying him. This review discusses the ending, including Natalya's role in the murders of Alex's parents and what is actually stored on the flash drive. That epilogue should have felt absurd to me. Alex has spent two years hiding, killing members of the mercenary team responsible for her parents' deaths, carrying the last important object they gave her, and assuming that attachment is a security problem. Dane, known as Striker, has been thrown out of the Navy after obeying an assassination order his superiors subsequently refused to own. They meet in Nice and go from mutual suspicion to sex to an international kidnapping and rescue in roughly two days. Then a month later he has a ring. I can list several reasons this should not work. The useful question is why I still closed the book satisfied. For me, it comes down to how consistently Elle James treats trust as something demonstrated by specific actions. The time scale is ridiculous, but within that compressed time Dane repeatedly gives Alex reasons to revise her judgment of him, and Alex repeatedly does the same for Dane. The thriller machinery is often implausible. The emotional transaction is much clearer. By the time the proposal arrives, I didn't believe a month was enough time for these two people to sensibly marry. I did believe they would say yes anyway. In this kind of romantic suspense, that distinction was enough for me.

The best example comes well before either one admits much of anything. A masked gunman breaks into Alex's hotel room through the balcony door. She knocks him over the railing, escapes upstairs, and goes to Dane because his is the one room where she thinks she might be safe. He offers the bed, takes the floor, and honors his promise not to touch her. This is not complicated characterization, but it is effective. Alex has very good practical reasons to distrust people. Her parents were CIA sleeper agents murdered in Moscow after their cover was compromised, and someone still wants what they left behind. Dane doesn't persuade her with a speech about being trustworthy. He behaves predictably when he has an opportunity not to.

That mattered to me because the book sometimes asks for much more tolerance when it handles operational logic. Dane arrives in France because a mysterious woman called Charley deposits $30,000 into his account, retrieves his repossessed truck, supplies a false passport, sends him first class to Nice and puts him in a tuxedo at an energy summit. His assignment is to prevent an assassination without being formally attached to the targets' security. Later Charley can access hotel surveillance, run facial recognition against government databases, arrange aircraft and cars, plant a tracker on Alex without her noticing, provide another former SEAL, weapons and C4 in Germany, and interfere with facility surveillance. At some point "I have connections" stops being an explanation and becomes a universal permission state.

I noticed that because the opening makes Dane's situation unusually concrete. He has been dishonorably discharged after carrying out a sanctioned assassination, cannot get suitable security work, is flipping hamburgers, has lost his truck and is close to eviction. Charley's offer therefore has leverage. I liked that. It makes accepting a suspicious package more believable than simple action-hero curiosity. But once her resources become effectively unlimited, many later obstacles can be solved because Charley has exactly the required capability. The book moves fast enough that I went with it, although I would have preferred one or two firm limits on what she could do.

Alex is the stronger character for me. Her backstory gives the title its second meaning because the assassin Dane is assigned to identify is not simply an external villain. Alex has hunted the mercenaries involved in killing her parents and has killed several people connected to the attack. Her history is not hidden from the reader for long, so the suspense is less "Is she dangerous?" than "What will Dane do when he learns how dangerous she is?" I liked that decision. She is competent before Dane protects her. In their first substantial encounter he sees her flip Petrov onto his back after Petrov refuses to accept no, then finds her holding a knife over him. Later she fights off an intruder, resists her kidnappers and kills one pursuer by sending him over a catwalk. Dane's rescue matters without turning her helpless.

There is also a small moment I appreciated when Alex gives Dane the flash drive and he refuses to take possession of it. By then he knows it may explain why her parents died. He has access to Charley's extraordinary information network and could easily justify taking it "for safekeeping." Instead he tells Alex it belongs to her and lets her use his computer. That is a more persuasive reason for her growing trust than the repeated descriptions of his body, and the book is better whenever it allows behavior to carry the point.

The drive itself produces the cleanest thriller payoff. Alex has spent two years unable to open one encrypted file. Dane suggests biometrics, and when she tries the drive in his laptop, its camera recognizes her face and opens the file. What appears is software code. Later we discover her parents stole a copy of ransomware associated with Natalya, who is using attacks on energy infrastructure as extortion while Sergei Baranovsky siphons natural gas for his own profit. The parents' death, Alex's survival, the summit's argument over pipeline security, the missing gas and the attack on Alex therefore converge on the same information. That convergence is neat and satisfying even though the technology is described at a very broad action-thriller level.

Natalya is also the reveal that worked best for me. She initially appears to be an unusually well-connected interpreter. She knows delegates personally, watches people's habits and has enough money and access to stand out. Alex finds her intrusive before she can explain why. Dane notices the same problem independently. When Natalya turns up in Germany and admits that she ordered Alex's parents killed because they stole her ransomware code, the book is not producing a villain from nowhere. It is confirming the suspicion attached to somebody who has been present and slightly wrong from early on. I prefer that to a final-chapter stranger.

The romance is much less patient. Dane and Alex move from interrogating each other to sharing a room, confiding family trauma, having explicit sex and contemplating a future together at remarkable speed. Chapter 9 in particular stops the suspense for an extended sex scene and then follows it with shower sex the next morning. If you want romantic suspense with the romance treated as a major physical component rather than a subplot, James is not ambiguous about what she is offering. For me, the scenes work better emotionally than temporally. Alex's desire to feel close to someone after two years of isolation is credible. Dane's immediate sense that two days with her cannot be enough is credible as infatuation. Calling this durable love so quickly requires genre tolerance I don't naturally have in unlimited supply.

There is one continuity point that bothered me more because it is unnecessary. Early on Dane says he grew up in foster care and joined the Navy at seventeen. Later, while talking to Alex in bed, he invents or presents an elaborate Texas-family history, including living parents and a father who raised cattle and taught him to fish. Because he is still protecting his cover, some lying is expected, but the text treats these details with an emotional sincerity that makes the boundary between cover story and actual background unnecessarily muddy. When a book is specifically about hidden identities, I want false biographical details to be cleanly attributable to the lie. Otherwise I start checking the information instead of staying with the conversation.

The same practical objection applies to Dane planting Alex's confiscated knife on Sergei, only for the police to later discover it in German minister Hans Sutter's pocket. The implication is that Sergei moved it. It creates suspicion and keeps the knife from incriminating Alex, but it is an awfully casual intervention in an active attempted-murder investigation by a protagonist whose assignment is supposed to stabilize the summit. Dane can be reckless. I just wanted him to recognize the downside more explicitly.

Once Alex is kidnapped, however, the novel quits pretending to be a restrained espionage story and becomes straightforward rescue action. That improves the final stretch. The fake bomb threat gets Alex isolated. She is drugged and flown to Germany. Baranovsky wants her because the flash drive may restore the compromised gas system. Natalya wants control of the ransomware and eventually destroys the physical drive. Dane and another former SEAL, Adam, breach the facility, while Alex is already fighting to escape. Dane takes a bullet meant for her, Adam kills Natalya, and Charley then reveals that her people copied the drive while it was connected to Dane's laptop. Convenient? Absolutely. Effective? Also yes.

I especially liked that the destruction of the physical drive is allowed to hurt for a moment. To Alex it is not just storage. It is the object her mother told her to save while her parents stayed behind and died. The later revelation that the data survives solves the plot problem without erasing what that physical thing meant to her. The CIA then uses the copied software to reverse the ransomware damage and develop protection against similar attacks. Alex finally knows why her parents considered the information worth the risk.

The geopolitics are mostly functional scenery. European energy demand, Nord Stream expansion, ransomware, Russian corruption and migration are introduced to create stakes and bring the characters into the same building. I would not read the novel for a convincing model of international energy negotiations or cybersecurity. A summit delegate effectively announcing that Russia has antivirus software capable of neutralizing ransomware, followed by demands that it simply be shared, is not exactly how I expect such a problem to behave. But the book is consistent about wanting the reader to understand the immediate state: gas must keep flowing, the delegates must survive, someone is stealing supply, someone else can shut the system down, and Alex possesses the relevant code. You always know what the current problem is.

That clarity is a significant reason I enjoyed the book. James rarely lets a scene sit without an actionable problem. Protect Petrov. Identify the attacker. Get Alex out of danger. Open the file. Find who ordered her parents killed. Track the kidnapped Alex. Enter the German facility. Escape. The transitions can be convenient, and characters often restate information we already know, but I was never wondering why a scene existed. At roughly novella-to-short-novel length, it reads quickly and behaves as though delay itself is suspicious.

The ending provides more resolution than realism. Alex gets a new identity and a San Diego home, Dane continues doing missions for Charley, their relationship advances to a proposal, and even Adam returns socially. I would have preferred a little more aftermath between "international criminal conspiracy resolved" and poolside engagement. Alex has spent years arranging her entire existence around hiding and vengeance. One month is not much time to discover who she is when neither is necessary. Still, the book knows the promise it made. This is a romance about two people whose identities have been damaged by secret institutions and violence, discovering that each can see the other's worst history without immediately leaving.

So yes, I recommend Shadow Assassin, with a fairly specific expectation attached. Come for fast military romantic suspense, explicit chemistry, capable protagonists and a conspiracy that resolves its principal clues. Do not demand procedural realism from Charley's resources or measured relationship pacing from people who fall in love between an assassination attempt and a ransomware crisis. I objected to both while reading, and neither objection stopped me wanting to see Dane reach Alex in Germany or wanting Alex to finally learn what her parents died protecting. The book kept giving me a concrete reason to turn the page. For this one, that was enough.

READER 03 OF 8 Did not finish

A failure of basic site security and structural logic

David Thompson

David Thompson, 63

16 reviews on RNKD · 6 min read

Did not finish Did not finish · stopped Chapter 5

SPOILERS This review discusses the part of the book this reader read, up to Chapter 5. It does not discuss the ending.

If you smash a glass balcony door at a luxury hotel during a high security international diplomatic summit, somebody is going to notice. It is not a quiet operation. Glass makes a distinct noise when it shatters, and it makes even more noise when you drag a heavy external frame across the shards. The security detail monitoring the perimeter will investigate. The delegates in the adjoining rooms will telephone the front desk to complain. You cannot simply break into a third floor suite at the Hotel Le Negresco in Nice, scuffle with the occupant, dangle over the railing, and expect the rest of the building to sleep through the event. I abandoned this novel shortly after chapter four because the author appears to believe physical buildings operate in a vacuum.

That was my limit. I read no further, so I cannot tell you whether the remaining chapters repair the damage.

The premise requires a substantial suspension of disbelief before we even reach the hotel. We are introduced to Dane Ryan, a disgraced former Navy SEAL who is currently flipping burgers in San Diego. He receives a telephone call from a mysterious woman named Charley. She wires thirty thousand dollars into his bank account, buys off the loan on his truck, and leaves a packet containing a fake passport and a tuxedo in his flat. His instructions are to fly to France and attend an energy summit. He accepts this arrangement without establishing who is funding it, which is the sort of poor sequencing that generally gets a person arrested.

Thirty thousand dollars arrives in his account from an untraceable source, and he assumes this is a legitimate employment offer rather than a setup for a major crime. A man who has been dishonourably discharged from the military ought to be highly suspicious of anonymous cash transfers. Instead, he follows the instructions to buy clothes and board an international flight. He does not know if he is being hired to transport illegal goods, perform a kidnapping, or act as a distraction. He simply goes. That is not the behaviour of a trained military operator. It is the behaviour of a man who lacks the basic survival instinct to ask for a proper contract.

It all felt entirely theatrical. There was no proper procedure to any of it.

The summit itself is meant to be a high stakes negotiation regarding the Nord Stream pipeline expansion. The attendees are ministers of energy from Germany, Russia, Italy, and the United Kingdom. I spent forty years in civil engineering, dealing with municipal infrastructure and drainage, so I am perhaps overly sensitive to how public works are discussed. The delegates behave like amateur dramatic society villains rather than technical ministers. They shout at each other across reception halls and storm out of meetings. Infrastructure procurement is tedious, deliberate work. It is not sorted out by men throwing tantrums in evening wear.

Phase two of the Nord Stream project is essentially an underwater transmission main. It requires immense compressor stations, pressure monitoring, and scheduled maintenance access. The delegates in this novel treat it like a garden hose they can simply turn on or off to threaten each other. There is no discussion of storage capacity, flow rates, or the practical mechanics of distributing millions of cubic feet of gas across the European grid. The German minister demands proof of antivirus software to prevent ransomware from shutting down the flow. I understand that cyber security is a modern threat, but physical pipelines still rely on mechanical valves and fail safes. The entire summit reads like an argument written by someone who has never looked at a civil engineering schematic.

I struggled to take any of these people seriously. Competence was completely absent.

Ryan's actual job at this summit is to act as a male escort for a translator, which serves as a convenient cover to put him in the room. This is where he encounters Alexa Sokoloff. She is another translator who attends the opening reception in a tight silver dress with a high slit. She also happens to be carrying a folding knife strapped to her thigh. Ryan follows her into the hotel garden, where she flips a heavily built Russian diplomat over her shoulder and prepares to stab him. When Ryan intervenes and removes the knife, her defence is that the diplomat was overly aggressive and she was merely teaching him that no means no. She then expects to return to her translation duties as though attempting to butcher a foreign minister is a standard hazard of the job.

The mechanism that finally drove me away occurs a few chapters later. Alexa returns to her third floor room. She hears glass breaking. A man is attempting to unlock her French doors from the balcony. She tackles him, driving him backward over the railing. He manages to catch the rail with one hand and dangles there. She pounds on his fingers for a moment, decides he is too strong, and retreats. Her response to a professional assassin breaking into her room is to push a room service dining cart in front of her door and run for the stairwell.

When Alexa flees her room, she specifically notes that she is taking the stairs rather than the lift. She goes from the third floor to the fifth floor. She worries about the sound of the stairwell door latch clicking. This is a rare moment of practical awareness, but it is immediately ruined by the lack of follow through. If you know the attacker is in the stairwell, you alert the authorities to trap him there. You do not simply hide in a stranger's room and hope the man in the ski mask gets bored and goes home.

This is where I closed the file. The sheer absurdity of the logic became intolerable.

She knocks on Ryan's door, and he lets her in. He looks through the peephole in his door. He observes a man wearing a black ski mask running past in the corridor. A man in a black ski mask is sprinting down the fifth floor of a luxury hotel hosting a global energy summit, and Ryan decides the most sensible course of action is to turn out the lights and offer Alexa his bed. He explicitly chooses not to ring the front desk because it would be difficult to explain the broken door in her room.

Leaving an active threat to roam a building because you wish to avoid an awkward conversation is a dereliction of duty.

I spent my working life verifying surveys and checking drainage outfalls. If a site report told me a pipe was clear but the water on the ground was backing up into the road, I trusted the water. The physical evidence matters. This author wants me to believe that a luxury hotel filled with diplomats and security details is completely deaf to breaking glass, scuffles, and masked men running down the stairs. The physical environment is treated as a flat painted backdrop rather than a real building with acoustics, staff, and proper surveillance.

The setting felt entirely hollow. It was just a convenient space to force the two main characters together.

Naturally, forcing them together is the actual objective. Ryan gives up his bed and makes a pallet on the floor with a comforter. He promises he will not touch her. She insists he take the bed instead. They end up sharing the mattress with a row of pillows between them, exchanging tragic backstories in the dark. It was blindingly obvious where the arrangement was heading. I have no objection to a romance novel, provided the characters earn my respect before they climb into bed together. As it stands, I found them both too incompetent to care about their eventual relationship.

If the foundational logic of a story is broken by chapter five, I have no reason to assume the situation will improve by chapter twenty. I want characters who solve problems by applying proper knowledge and assessing the reality in front of them. These people simply bumbled through a set of contrived obstacles while the surrounding world obligingly ignored their noise.

I had seen enough.

I put the book down and did not return to it the next evening. The pipeline negotiations were childish, the security protocols were non existent, and the decisions made by the supposed experts were consistently terrible. I cannot judge whether they eventually uncovered the grand conspiracy, but I suspect the investigation involved a great deal more broken glass and ignored alarms. I prefer a proper job, and this was distinctly lacking.

READER 04 OF 8

If You're Going to Point a Gun at Someone, Point the Gun

Emily Johnson

Emily Johnson, 29

20 reviews on RNKD · 7 min read

DEPENDS Finished the book

SPOILERS This review discusses the whole book, including how it ends.

If you are going to hold a gun on someone, hold the gun on them. Don't stop to deliver your org chart, your motive, and your billing dispute with the Nord Stream pipeline first. Somewhere around minute three of Natalya explaining her ransomware surcharge structure to a woman she has already decided to kill, I checked how many pages were left and did some math I probably shouldn't have needed to do at that point in a thriller.

I'm going to talk about how this ends, including who the villain turns out to be, because that reveal is exactly where the book's problems come into focus for me. If you don't want that spoiled, this isn't the review for you.

Here's the setup, quickly, because I don't think the plot is really the point of this book. A disgraced Navy SEAL named Dane Ryan, who everyone calls Striker, gets a call from a woman named Charley who wires him thirty thousand dollars, gives him his repossessed truck back free and clear, and sends him to a diplomatic energy summit in Nice wearing a tuxedo he's never worn a version of in his life. Nobody explains how Charley affords any of this, or who she works for, or why a shadowy handler with apparently unlimited resources needs to recruit a broke burger-flipper off a bar stool instead of just hiring literally anyone else. I kept waiting for that to be addressed. It never is. She's just capable, the way a vending machine is just stocked.

At the summit, Striker meets Alex, who is posing as an interpreter and is actually the daughter of two murdered CIA sleeper agents, hunting the person who ordered her parents' deaths two years earlier. She also happens to know Krav Maga, carry a folding knife into a security-screened diplomatic reception, and store a flash drive in her bra that unlocks its encrypted file only when the laptop's built-in camera happens to catch her face. I have opinions about that last one specifically, because I work with actual computers that actual hospitals use for actual secure records, and 'the webcam took her picture and the mystery file just opened' is not how any of that functions, even in a world with generous rules. It's not that I need the tech to be real. I need it to behave consistently enough that I stop noticing it's fake.

That noticing is basically my whole reading experience with this book. Not because the prose is bad, exactly. It moves. Chapters end on reasonable hooks. But almost every mechanism that matters gets waved through instead of built. Charley knows everything about everyone before anyone tells her anything. A tracking disc gets slipped into Alex's pocket at some point that is never shown on the page, and we just find out later it happened. A former SEAL named Adam shows up in a Ferrari that Charley apparently chartered along with C4, detonators, and body armor, delivered to rural Germany on a few hours' notice, and nobody blinks. I don't need my thrillers to be a supply-chain audit. But when every single obstacle gets solved by 'Charley has connections,' the plot stops being a plot and starts being a woman narrating outcomes to me.

The romance is the part most readers will actually be here for, and I want to be fair about what it's doing, since fair is a word I don't hand out for free. Alex and Striker meet at the reception, and within roughly forty-eight hours of story time they've shared a bed, a shower, a rescue mission across an international border, and by the epilogue a proposal by a swimming pool in San Diego. That's not a slow burn. That's barely a burn. I don't object to fast romance on principle, some of the best short fiction earns speed through specific behavior instead of time. What bothered me here is that the speed gets treated as depth. He tells her he loves her because she flipped a Russian diplomat over her shoulder at a party. That's a good scene. It is not a reason to propose marriage a month later to a woman who has, by her own account, killed several people and can't tell him where she'll be living next month either.

What actually worked for me, and I want to say this plainly because I don't think praise needs an apology attached to it, is the backstory of Alex's parents. The scene where her mother pushes her toward the pantry escape hatch while gunfire starts on the other side of a door, the flashlight, the safe combination her shaking hands can't get open on the first try, the smoke coming through the wall before she has to leave without knowing for certain her parents are dead: that landed. It's the one stretch of the book where the danger has weight instead of choreography, and where a decision (leave, or stay and probably die uselessly) actually costs the character something instead of just advancing the timeline.

The villain reveal undercuts a lot of that, though. Natalya, the older interpreter who's been floating charmingly through every scene since chapter one, turns out to be the one who ordered the hit on Alex's parents, is running the ransomware extortion on the pipeline, and delivers her whole confession out loud while holding a gun on the person she wants dead, apparently because the plot needed her to explain herself before Adam could shoot her from off to the side. I don't mind a villain with a plan. I mind a villain who stops advancing that plan specifically so the reader can be caught up. It's the same problem as a discharge summary written for the chart instead of for the patient going home tired: the information might be accurate, but it's organized for the wrong audience.

I also want to flag the file itself, since it matters to how I read the last third. The document I was given doesn't stop cleanly at the end of Shadow Assassin. It runs straight into the opening chapters of a different author's book in the same series, no real transition, just Elle James's story ending and Becca Jameson's starting a few pages later with an entirely new cast. I understand this is a shared-world publishing arrangement, several authors, one premise, one release schedule. But it means the book I was actually assigned to judge is shorter than it first appears, a novella dressed as a full book, and it explains a lot about the shortcuts. There isn't room in forty-some thousand words to build Charley's motives, or Natalya's operation, or a courtship that earns its ending. So the book borrows trust it hasn't built yet and spends it on a proposal scene.

I'll say something for the dialogue, because it's better than the plumbing around it. The early back-and-forth between Striker and Alex in the garden, and later in the hotel room when neither of them will admit what they actually do for a living, has some real snap to it. 'I like to know my enemies.' 'Am I one of your enemies?' That kind of thing works because both characters are lying competently and enjoying it, which is more interesting to me than most of the actual assassination plot. If the whole book had been two competent liars circling each other in one hotel, instead of a rescue mission bolted onto a pipeline dispute bolted onto a ransomware plot, I think I would have liked it more.

The ending resolution for the actual crisis, the natural gas shortage that supposedly threatens Europe's winter, gets settled in one paragraph: the CIA's cyber unit works day and night and has the gas flowing again in forty-eight hours, and Anatoly Petrov promises better security and everyone signs the pipeline deal. I laughed a little at that, not because it's implausible exactly, but because an entire summit's worth of shouting about siphoned gas and hacked infrastructure gets closed out with less attention than the swimming pool sex scene that follows it. Priorities were set, and they weren't the ones the book spent the first half insisting mattered.

So who is this actually for. If you want something you can read in an evening, that moves fast, gives you a tough woman with a knife, a soldier with a conscience, and a happy ending with a diamond ring by a pool, and you're willing to not ask how the webcam unlocked the file or why nobody in the CIA cyber unit needed more than two days, this will do exactly what it's built to do. It's comfort reading, low commitment, the genre equivalent of eating something out of a bag standing at the counter. There's a real audience for that, and I don't think less of them for it.

I'm not that reader, most nights. I spend my working life noticing when a plan on paper doesn't survive contact with an actual person going home tired, and I carry that same habit into a paperback. When Charley's omniscience gets treated as a personality instead of a plot hole, when the villain monologues instead of finishing the job, when two people decide they're getting married a month after meeting because of one good shoulder throw, I stop trusting the book to know what it's doing, and once that trust goes, everything after it reads like performance instead of story.

I finished it. It's short enough that finishing wasn't a real decision, more like momentum. I don't regret the couple of hours. I also don't think I'll remember much about it in a month besides the pantry escape hatch and the fact that a woman explained her extortion pricing model at gunpoint instead of pulling the trigger.

If someone in my building tells me they want a fast, low-stakes military romance with a competent woman and a soldier who cooks, I'll hand this over without hesitation and mean it. If they ask me whether it holds up if you think about it for more than the length of the book itself, I'll tell them the truth, which is no, not really, and that depends entirely on whether that's the kind of thing that bothers you.

READER 05 OF 8

They have somewhere to be that is not a hotel corridor

James Wilson

James Wilson, 38

21 reviews on RNKD · 9 min read

WOULD RECOMMEND Finished the book

SPOILERS This review discusses the whole book, including how it ends.

They're getting dressed because a car has pulled up, and Alex has just said yes. Dane had the ring in the shorts he dumped on a lounge chair after they made love in the pool. Adam and Angela were due in under an hour. I should say now that this review goes through the ending, including who ordered the murder of Alex's parents, who dies at the German substation, and what was on the flash drive she carried in her bra for two years. I finished the book. The last pages are a house in San Diego with a bay view, new papers, and two people who finally have somewhere to be that is not a hotel corridor. A month before that they were on a chartered plane out of Germany, Dane's side bandaged from a round meant for Alex, her head on his shoulder. Natalya Zotin is dead on the factory floor. Adam Nichols shot her after she used Alex as a shield and kept trying to fire. Sergei Baranovsky was already down in the control room, shot while he wrestled her for the pistol. Natalya had crushed the physical flash drive under a high heel. She admitted she ordered the mercenaries who burned the Moscow house because Alex's parents, CIA sleepers working as the Federovs, had copied her ransomware. That ransomware had just shut Nord Stream. She wanted half of what Baranovsky was siphoning and half his Swiss money. He thought the old copy would let him skip her. Alex had been grabbed on a Nice loading dock after a bomb threat emptied the summit, stuck with a syringe, flown, stuffed in a car boot, and dropped in front of a wall of blue monitors. Dane reached her because Charley had put a tracker in her pocket and had a Ferrari waiting at Greifswald with another former SEAL driving. They subdued a gate guard with zip ties, packed C4 against a side door, and walked into the argument. Charley's people had already copied the drive when Alex opened it on Dane's laptop. The webcam had taken her face and unlocked the file. The CIA used that copy at Dulles, with Alex present, and had the gas moving again in forty-eight hours. Petrov then got the delegates to sign the second pipeline. That is a complete job. I work in a place where requests sit in queues labelled pending internal review, so a story that actually closes the loop is a relief even when it arrives with a tuxedo and a fake passport. Before Germany there was the last morning in Nice, the shower, the kiss in the stairwell, and Alex walking into the conference while Dane went upstairs to tell Charley the drive had opened. The file was programming code. Alex wanted it handed to Langley with a written promise she would walk free. Charley agreed to set the meeting. Then the bomb threat emptied the hall. I had already watched Petrov get stabbed in the reception on night one, while Dane was in the garden taking a knife off Alex after she flipped Petrov onto his back. Dane slipped that knife into Sergei's pocket and it turned up on Hans Sutter instead. The cameras never showed the stabber. Alex's own room got a balcony break-in the same night. She charged the man over the rail, he hung on, she ran to Dane's suite with a backpack and slept with a bathroom light left on. By the next night the pillows between them were on the floor. They tell each other they love each other on the lounge chair in San Diego. He says he fell for her when she flipped Petrov at the summit. She says yes. Then they have to put clothes on because the guests have arrived. That is an ordinary ending after a control room and a car boot, and it is the reason I did not feel the previous days of plot had been wasted. I am not usually interested in people who decide they are in love after one hotel stay, but the book does not pretend they have a five-year courtship. They have a shared problem, a shared bed, and then a shared extraction. The month in San Diego is the first time either of them has a routine that is not running.

Dane starts the book nearly evicted from a San Diego flat, flipping burgers, truck repossessed, a dishonourable discharge blocking any job that looks like security. He is in McP's in the afternoon when Charley rings, uses the name Striker, knows the foster care, knows he joined at seventeen, and knows he took the Internal Affairs shot because people above him ordered it and then let him carry the black mark. Thirty thousand lands in the account. The truck is in the car park with knobby tyres, tinted glass, a frog decal, and no debt. The envelope has a Daniel Rayne passport, a first-class ticket, cash for a clothing shop, a tuxedo waiting in a Negresco suite, and a burner. He nearly sends it all back because money like that usually means a hit. She says she does not want him to kill anyone. She wants him to stop an assassination at a two-day energy summit so a pipeline can be agreed before a bad winter. I believed that more as the pages went on, not because she is kind, but because she keeps producing the next item the job needs. A laptop with hall footage. A tracker in a pocket. A driver who has already quit her. A plane on a German tarmac. She never walks into the room. Adam Nichols still turns up because a frogman is in trouble, then says he will not work for her again until she shows her face. That is a handler who owns the next step without putting her name on the door. I have time for that. I spend enough of my week trying to find out who owns a request that has been sitting in a queue.

Alex is not a surprise threat so much as a woman who has been operating without backup. The silver dress, the thigh knife, the American English under the Russian, all of that is costume. The real inventory is the pantry tunnel, the church garden, the warehouse days, the hollowed pallet on a cruise ship, the Idaho trainers, the Swiss accounts her parents left, and the one file labelled PAV that would not open. The night the door came in, her mother sent her for the drive and told her to go. She watched the house burn from a wall. She killed the mercenary team later, and a double agent who had sat at their table and then tried to drown her by a river. She kept the encrypted file because she did not trust the CIA with whatever had been worth burning a family. When Dane uses her childhood name, Anya, in the fifth-floor room she goes pale and then puts the drive on the desk while she changes. He leaves it there. I noticed that more than the sex. In my line of work, people who can sit in front of a file and not pocket it are not the majority.

The Nice chapters are mostly watching and translating. Dane waltzes with Natalya, who is too well dressed for a translator's wage, then follows Alex and Petrov into the garden because of a slit in a silver dress and a mark that might be a strap. Petrov grabs. Alex says nyet, breaks his hold, flips him, and has the knife up when Dane twists her wrist. He walks them back in as if they were a couple late for a dance. Petrov still gets stabbed in the hall by someone the cameras never isolate. The next day Alex sits beside Hans Sutter and murmurs translations while Petrov talks antivirus software he will not share and Weddington asks why. Sutter slams a fist. Petrov goes white and is wheeled out. Natalya invites Alex to lunch, speaks eight languages, and follows her to the third floor with a smile that does not mean friendship. Dane spends hours on the laptop and in the lobby, then meets Alex in a stairwell and kisses her forehead without having planned to. She bolts. He still walks her the rest of the way. I found Natalya more interesting than Petrov, which the book eventually agrees with. She does not fade. She collects knowledge and treats it as stock. When she turns out to be the ransomware operator, it does not rewrite her. It is the same woman with the invoice finally on the table.

A few of the mechanics are daft. The escort cover for a man who moves like infantry lasts until Alex looks at him properly. Planting a knife during a crowded police search only works if nobody in that hall is doing their job. A Ferrari as the car you take to a German gas terminal is a choice. C4 on an allied facility, with a note not to take extra lives, is the sort of plan I would want in an email I could later find. Charley taking the cameras down at the exact minute they arrive is tidy. The bomb threat as a way to get Alex onto a loading dock is tidy. I still did not stop. The book does not sit in the inconvenience. Dane checks the peephole. Alex punches the wrong lift button on purpose and takes stairs the long way. They leave the banquet at different times. That is how you actually get out of a building when you do not know who is in the corridor.

The physical relationship is blunt and quick. Night one they argue about the chair and the floor and end up with pillows as a border. Night two she says she wants it. There is a condom in the wallet. There is another in the shower before the last session. A month later there is a ring, a privacy fence, and a joke about getting dressed before the guests see them. I would not organise my own life on that timetable. The book is not set in a terrace with a school run. These two have been professionally alone. He was thrown out of the only job he knew. She has not slept through the night since the fire. The first person who neither robbed her nor handed her to the police is going to carry a lot of weight. The writing treats the sex as bodies and timing rather than a speech about fate. That kept me from getting irritated. I cared that they got ordinary days afterwards. Shorter jobs for Charley. A pool. A bay. Someone bringing a first-aid kit onto the plane without making a fuss.

I am not going to dress this up as a novel about European energy. The pipeline is a reason for the room to be full and for the software to matter. What the book became, for me, is a story about what happens after an institution dumps you and someone unofficial offers a second job that might actually finish. Dane cannot get the discharge taken off. Alex cannot get her parents back. They get a copied file that turns the gas on, new names, and a house. Charley remains a voice in an earbud. Adam still will not sign on again until she shows her face. That unfinished bit is honest. I spend my weeks telling people that submitted does not mean a person is looking. A story in which the looking happens, the copy is used, and the two people involved are not left in a queue, did the job I wanted it to do.

If you need a relationship to take a year before anyone shares a bed, this will feel rushed. If you need every security procedure to survive contact with a real hotel, you will mutter at the glass door and the knife. If you can live with a thriller that treats getting the next step owned as the point, and that lets two tired people stop running without a lecture about following their dreams, you will have a decent time. I did. I closed it on the pool and the ring and the car in the drive, and I was glad they had somewhere to be.

READER 06 OF 8 Did not finish

By the second morning, I no longer believed the danger

Oliver Evans

Oliver Evans, 23

16 reviews on RNKD · 7 min read

Did not finish Did not finish · stopped chapter 9, shortly after Alex and Dane's shower scene on the morning of the final day of the Energy Summit

SPOILERS This review discusses the part of the book this reader read, up to chapter 9, shortly after Alex and Dane's shower scene on the morning of the final day of the Energy Summit. It does not discuss the ending.

The point where I stopped giving the danger the benefit of the doubt was the morning after somebody broke into Alex's room. A masked man has smashed the glass in her balcony door, entered carrying a gun and chased her through Hotel Le Negresco. Alex escapes to Dane's room, spends the night there, then gets dressed and goes back to work at the Energy Summit. By the next morning, she and Dane are having sex in the shower before she returns to the conference again. Somewhere during that progression I realised the book and I were applying completely different meanings to the word danger. I stopped in chapter 9, shortly after that shower scene, so I did not finish Shadow Assassin and cannot say what happens with the summit, the Russians, the person pursuing Alex, or the information her parents left her.

I had been willing to go along with quite a lot before then. Dane Ryan, called Striker, is a former Navy SEAL who was dishonorably discharged after carrying out an assassination ordered by his superiors. He is broke in San Diego when a mysterious woman calling herself Charley deposits thirty thousand dollars in his account, returns his repossessed truck, supplies a false passport and sends him to Nice. The setup is ridiculous in an enjoyable thriller sort of way. Dane knows it looks suspicious. He repeatedly questions Charley, and his first assignment at the Energy Summit gives the story a clear task: prevent an assassination of Russian diplomats without telling them he is protecting them.

Alex also initially worked for me as a complication. She is introduced in a silver dress, apparently working as a translator, and Dane follows her into the hotel garden when she leaves with Anatoly Petrov. Petrov grabs her after she tells him no, she throws him onto his back, and she produces a knife. Dane intervenes before she can use it. Crucially, Alex is not actually the person who subsequently stabs Petrov in the crowded reception hall. That gives Dane a sensible problem. He has encountered a woman who is plainly dangerous and plainly concealing something, but he also knows she could not have committed the attack he was employed to prevent.

The trouble is that sensible questions keep producing behaviour I couldn't make fit the supposedly competent people involved. Dane takes Alex's knife and, when French police begin searching guests after Petrov is stabbed, secretly puts it into Sergei Baranovsky's pocket. It apparently ends up being found in Hans Sutter's pocket instead. Dane has just planted evidence during a police investigation at an international summit. I expected that decision to cause a substantial problem. Instead it functions largely as another little complication while Dane and Alex continue circling one another. For a man whose professional identity is built around competence, this felt less like calculated improvisation and more like the plot requiring him to be reckless.

Then they review surveillance footage together in Dane's hotel room. Charley's people have obtained access and supplied him with a laptop, yet Dane lets Alex, whom he has recently suspected of being an assassin, sit beside him while he examines it. He admits he has no reason to trust her but decides that something about her makes him trust her anyway. That became a recurring shortcut. Whenever the thriller gives Dane a reason to become more cautious, attraction provides an equally quick reason for him not to be. The book tells me his instincts are unusually valuable while repeatedly arranging matters so those instincts point toward the woman the romance needs him to trust.

Alex's history should have made this much harder. Her parents were CIA sleeper agents living in Moscow as Mischa and Pavel Federov. After armed men stormed their home, Alex escaped through a hidden passage and watched the house burn. She later trained in self-defense and combat, returned to Russia and pursued people connected to her parents' murders. She admits that men have died during this search. Whatever moral distinction the story eventually intends to make, the portion I read gives Dane very good reasons to treat her as an unknown quantity rather than an unusually attractive colleague.

Chapter 4 was where those competence problems became difficult for me to ignore. A man breaks the glass of Alex's balcony door and reaches inside to unlock it. Alex charges him, nearly sends him over the third-floor balcony and then runs. Fair enough in the immediate emergency. What bothered me was what followed. She refuses to report the attack because she does not want attention and goes to Dane instead. He suggests contacting the front desk and security, but ultimately they simply remain in his room. This is not a quiet safe house. It is Hotel Le Negresco during a heavily monitored international Energy Summit where Petrov has already been stabbed. Somebody has just made an armed entry into a guest's room, and the response rapidly becomes a sleeping-arrangements conversation.

That conversation also accelerates the romance far beyond what I could believe. Dane offers Alex the bed, sleeps on the floor, then eventually joins her in the bed with pillows between them. They exchange personal histories in the dark. Some of that is perfectly serviceable romantic material in isolation. The problem is placement. Alex has just escaped an armed attacker. Dane's mission is already failing around him. Neither knows who stabbed Petrov. Alex still has major secrets. Yet the scene steadily turns the immediate threat into intimacy, and by the next day Dane is kissing her forehead and thinking about how naturally it happened.

There is also an odd amount of explanation for things the scene has already established. Dane notices Alex is capable, then thinks about how capable she is. Alex notices his military bearing, then questions him about that bearing. Both characters repeatedly reconsider whether the other can be trusted, normally arriving at much the same answer as before. I don't mind straightforward prose. I usually prefer knowing what a character has actually concluded. Here, though, the internal narration kept restating conclusions instead of making the uncertainty more interesting.

Charley's investigation eventually confirms that Alex is Alexa Sokolov and had lived in Russia under another identity. Dane confronts her, and she tells him about her parents and the information she has carried since their deaths. This should substantially alter their relationship because both have finally admitted important truths. Instead, it seemed to remove most of the remaining resistance almost immediately. Alex leaves the device containing her parents' information beside Dane while she changes. Dane decides not to take it. Soon she uses his computer and gains access to a previously inaccessible file when the computer apparently recognises her face. What appears is programming code, which pushes her toward handing the information to the CIA.

That particular sequence irritated me partly because the technology is being used as a convenient answer rather than a process anybody has to understand. Alex has spent two years protecting this information and says she has consulted hackers, yet plugging it into Dane's supplied computer suddenly gets her through because of facial recognition. Dane then describes what he sees vaguely as some kind of computer programming language. I wasn't expecting a technical manual, and I certainly don't require fictional software to resemble my working day. I did need the solution to feel less like the computer had discovered the exact feature the scene required.

By chapter 9, attraction has become sex, then quickly more sex, while both characters are already thinking about how difficult it will be to part. The explicitness itself wasn't why I stopped. It was the speed with which the book converted roughly a day and a half of suspicion, attempted murder, concealed identities and active surveillance into emotional certainty. Alex even corrects herself when the possibility of love enters her thoughts, noting that love grows over time and that they barely know each other. That was exactly my objection. The narration recognises the compressed timetable and then carries on producing feelings at that timetable anyway.

The shower scene the following morning was my stopping point because I no longer wanted to test whether the thriller would recover its urgency. Alex needs to get downstairs for the final day of an international summit. Someone recently invaded her room with a gun. Her identity has been exposed. Dane has learned that she may have killed people connected with her parents' deaths. Charley has explicitly warned him that Alex could be dangerous. They nevertheless have another sexual encounter before heading downstairs. I could understand two frightened people grabbing at pleasure under pressure. What I couldn't buy was the surrounding lack of consequence. Their physical relationship was advancing more reliably than either investigation.

There were still unanswered questions when I stopped. I wanted to know who attacked Petrov, who sent the man after Alex, what the information from her parents actually meant and what Charley was really running. Curiosity had not reached zero. It simply wasn't enough to compensate for repeatedly watching supposedly wary, highly trained people behave as though the security problem could wait whenever the romance wanted the room. I cannot judge whether later chapters answer those questions well, because I did not read them.

What I can judge is the nine chapters I tried. Shadow Assassin gave me a clean mission, several potentially useful mysteries and two protagonists with plenty of reasons not to trust each other. Then it kept asking me to accept trust because they felt it, competence because their backgrounds promised it, and danger while the characters repeatedly found time to behave as though the danger was temporarily suspended. By the second morning, I wasn't wondering whether Alex and Dane would make it through the summit. I was wondering why I was still reading when I no longer believed the conditions the story itself had established. That was a fairly easy problem to solve.

READER 07 OF 8

The part that kept me reading was who earned the right to be trusted

Robert Martinez

Robert Martinez, 67

16 reviews on RNKD · 8 min read

WOULD RECOMMEND Finished the book

SPOILERS This review discusses the whole book, including how it ends.

Put Shadow Assassin beside the usual military romantic suspense paperbacks and you will recognize the equipment right away: former SEAL, secret assignment, international threat, capable woman in danger, guns, sex and a boss who knows considerably more than she explains. What kept separating this one in my mind was trust. Almost everybody is working under a false name, withholding information or making a judgment about somebody with incomplete evidence. That gave me something more useful to follow than the pipeline politics. I am going to discuss the ending and identify the person behind the murders, so consider that fair warning.

Dane "Striker" Ryan begins in a position that makes his judgment matter. He has been dishonorably discharged after carrying out an assassination ordered by people above him, and civilian life has gone badly enough that he is flipping hamburgers, losing his apartment and has already lost his truck. Then a woman calling herself Charley puts $30,000 in his account, returns his truck, provides a false passport and sends him to France. I would have considerably more questions than Dane does before getting on that airplane. Still, I liked that the book establishes immediately why he takes an offer that ought to make any sensible person suspicious. He is desperate, but he still draws a line when he thinks Charley might be hiring him to murder somebody. She isn't. His job at the energy summit in Nice is to prevent an assassination of Russian delegates.

Then Alexa Sokolov walks in carrying considerably more trouble than her silver dress suggests. This was the part I kept coming back to. Dane sees her take Anatoly Petrov into the garden, watches Petrov grab her, and then sees Alex put him on his back and produce a knife. Dane stops her. Alex insists she was defending herself and wasn't going to kill Petrov. The interesting question is not whether either character has a clean record. Neither one does. It is whether Dane can distinguish what he actually observed from what he assumes about her.

That distinction works for me.

Alex has spent two years hunting the people responsible for murdering her parents, CIA sleeper agents who were killed when mercenaries attacked their Moscow home. She escaped through the concealed passage her parents had prepared and took the flash drive her mother ordered her to save. She later trained herself to fight and pursued the mercenaries and the people connecting them to the murder order. Dane eventually learns the CIA suspects her in several deaths. The book could have made her merely the person the SEAL must rescue. It does not. She has already survived the event that defined her, built false identities, acquired serious fighting skills and conducted her own investigation before Dane ever arrives.

What I especially liked is that Dane's usefulness to Alex is not that he suddenly makes her competent. She already is. His usefulness is that he gives her somebody competent she can finally rely on. There is a difference. When a masked gunman breaks through the balcony door of her hotel room, Alex charges him and knocks him over the railing. He hangs on, and she gets out rather than standing around to admire her work. She goes upstairs, changes floors to confuse anyone following her and ends up at Dane's room. He does not take over her whole life. He gives her a secure place to stay, checks the corridor and starts asking the right question: why is somebody specifically coming after her?

The book does ask me to accept security arrangements I wouldn't hire at any price. Petrov is stabbed in a crowded diplomatic reception. Alex's hotel balcony door is smashed and a gunman gets into her room. Dane and Alex move around the hotel and between floors while multiple interested parties are watching them. Charley can obtain surveillance footage, penetrate databases, arrange transportation, plant a tracker and apparently get specialized equipment almost anywhere it is needed. The French authorities seem considerably less capable. If I stop and inspect every connection, there are loose ones.

I didn't stop much.

Part of the reason is that James keeps events moving, but the larger reason is that the secrecy keeps changing meaning. At first Dane lies about being Daniel Rayne, a paid escort. Alex lies about being merely an interpreter. Both recognize quickly that the other's story does not fit the observed skills. Dane can disarm her too easily. Alex can throw large men around and carries knives into places where ordinary interpreters generally don't. Once Charley uncovers Alex's history and Dane confronts her with the name Anya Federov, the scene works because neither person gets to claim the moral high ground. Dane has killed under orders. Alex has killed while pursuing the men connected to her parents. They start being useful to each other when they stop pretending otherwise.

The flash drive became my other fixation. Alex carries the thing in her bra for most of the book, which is memorable whether anybody thinks it is a sensible storage system or not. Her parents died protecting the information, but she cannot open the important encrypted file. When she finally tries it on Dane's laptop, the camera activates and the file opens through facial recognition. Inside is computer code she cannot interpret. This is not a book I would use to learn cybersecurity. Dane's suggestion that biometrics might be involved arrives conveniently, and Charley's technical reach is close to unlimited whenever the plot needs another door opened. But as a story object, the drive works because it joins Alex's grief to the present threat. She isn't protecting random secret data. She wants to know what her parents considered worth dying for.

The romance moves much faster than I would believe in ordinary life. Dane and Alex know each other for roughly two days before they are sleeping together and thinking in terms considerably larger than a temporary affair. Chapter 9 also spends a good deal of time proving that neither one has suddenly become shy. Readers who prefer their romantic suspense with explicit sex will get it. I was more interested in the conversation before that, when two armed, suspicious people begin telling each other things they have protected from everybody else. Alex sleeping soundly in Dane's room after years of vigilance says more to me about the relationship than the extended bedroom scene does.

The quick attachment does have a payoff because it changes Dane's mission. Charley originally hires him to protect the Russians long enough for the pipeline agreement to happen. Once Alex and the flash drive become the more important target, Dane's priority changes. During a bomb threat, Alex is separated from him, kidnapped from the loading area, drugged and flown out of France. Charley has had a tracking disc planted on her, which is invasive and also exactly the kind of contingency I had come to expect from Charley. Dane follows with another former SEAL, Adam Nichols, to a Nord Stream facility near Greifswald.

This is where the pipeline material finally becomes more than conference-room arguing. Sergei Baranovsky has been siphoning natural gas. Natalya Zotin, the polished interpreter who seems to know everybody, is behind the ransomware operation and wants a share of Sergei's stolen money. More important to Alex, Natalya admits she ordered the attack that killed Alex's parents after they stole a copy of her ransomware software. That reveal worked for me because Natalya has been present from the beginning, watching people, following Alex and demonstrating that her interpreter job gives her unusual access. She is not somebody introduced on the last ten pages because the story needs a culprit.

The final rescue is not subtle. Dane and Adam arrive in a Ferrari with weapons, body armor, C4 and other equipment supplied through Charley's mysterious network. They subdue a guard, breach the facility and find Alex while she is already fighting for herself. Natalya shoots Dane when he dives to protect Alex, then Adam shoots Natalya dead. Dane's wound is fortunately minor. I liked that combination better than a rescue where Alex waits tied to a chair. Even after being kidnapped, she frees her wrists, tries to escape and sends one pursuing man over a catwalk railing. Dane gets her out, but Alex remains an active participant in staying alive.

There is one more convenient turn that I should mention. Natalya crushes the flash drive under her shoe, apparently destroying the information Alex's parents died to preserve. Charley then reveals that her people copied its contents while it was attached to Dane's computer. That is very Charley. She is practically a walking answer to the question of how the heroes can obtain whatever they need next. Normally that would wear out my patience. Here it became part of the series premise I was willing to accept. Adam himself distrusts Charley because she refuses to show her face and knows too much about everyone. The book at least recognizes that her methods are unsettling rather than expecting me to call them normal.

A month later, the CIA has used the software to reverse the ransomware damage, natural gas is flowing again, and Alex has a new identity and a home in San Diego. Petrov promises the summit participants that the siphoning will stop, and the pipeline project goes forward. Dane continues doing missions for Charley. Alex and Dane are together, and after more sex in the pool he proposes. She says yes. Two days of danger followed by a month of dating is not the schedule I would recommend for a major life decision, but this is where genre expectations matter. The book has never pretended these two are going to spend eighteen months comparing insurance deductibles before deciding whether they belong together.

What sold me was the way their skills and suspicions fit. Alex does not need Dane because she is helpless. Dane does not need Alex because she repairs his military record. Both have had institutions and people give them reasons to distrust authority, yet neither gives up on judging individuals by what they actually do. Dane leaves Alex's flash drive alone when he could take it. Alex comes to him after the break-in. He tells her his real identity after learning hers. She finally decides to deliver her parents' information to the CIA rather than keep carrying the whole matter by herself. Those choices are rushed, but they form a consistent line through all the shooting, disguises and international travel.

I would recommend Shadow Assassin to somebody who wants military romantic suspense to move and does not require the security or computer details to survive a technical inspection. The plot has conveniences, Charley's capabilities can solve almost anything, and the romance reaches marriage speed awfully fast. None of those knocked me out of the story because Alex and Dane kept giving me a reason to see the next problem through. For what it costs in disbelief, I got a capable pair, a clear threat, a villain whose reveal connects back to the central loss, and an ending that finishes the job. That'll get you by just fine for this kind of book.

READER 08 OF 8

Trust comes quickly when nobody has time to check the paperwork

Sarah Williams

Sarah Williams, 51

17 reviews on RNKD · 7 min read

DEPENDS Finished the book

SPOILERS This review discusses the whole book, including how it ends.

I would recommend Shadow Assassin only to readers who want their romantic suspense fast, explicit and cheerfully unconcerned with whether every practical detail survives inspection. I finished it easily enough, and there is something quite efficient about the way Elle James keeps Alex Sokolov and former Navy SEAL Dane Ryan moving from one problem to the next. But efficiency is also where I kept getting caught. These are supposedly cautious people operating around an international energy summit, assassinations, intelligence agencies and ransomware, yet basic questions of access, identity and responsibility are repeatedly waved through because the next action scene or romantic encounter needs to happen. I am going to discuss the ending and reveal who ordered the murder of Alex's parents, because the eventual answer is important to why the thriller partly worked for me and partly did not. If you need the security arrangements and international politics to be convincing, I think you will spend too much time asking who authorised all this. If you mainly want a capable assassin heroine, an ex-SEAL hero and a romance conducted at considerable speed between dangerous incidents, it is a much easier proposition.

The useful idea at the centre is trust, particularly what people do when every formal institution has already given them a reason not to trust it. Dane has been dishonourably discharged after carrying out an assassination ordered by people above him, then left unable to find decent work. A mysterious woman calling herself Charley contacts him, deposits $30,000 in his bank account, returns his repossessed truck, provides a fake passport and sends him first class to Nice. This should make Charley look extremely alarming. It often does. Dane repeatedly wonders who she is and how she knows so much, yet he still accepts the job because he needs the money and because she offers the possibility of restoring the sort of useful work he lost. Alex has an even stronger reason for suspicion. Her parents were CIA sleeper agents murdered in Moscow, and she escaped through a concealed passage with passports, money and a flash drive her mother told her to protect. For two years she has stayed officially dead while hunting the people responsible. I believed her reluctance to hand that drive to the CIA more readily than I believed several of the physical escapes. She wants to know what her parents died protecting before another organisation takes the information and decides what she is allowed to know. That is a recognisable question about control, not merely another secret inserted to keep the plot running.

What strained matters for me was how quickly sensible caution becomes selective caution. At the reception Dane sees Alex with a knife over Anatoly Petrov after she has thrown him to the ground. She explains that Petrov grabbed her and would not accept no for an answer, which the scene supports, but Dane still knows almost nothing about her. Later, when Petrov is stabbed by somebody else, Dane has already slipped Alex's knife into Sergei Baranovsky's pocket. It somehow ends up being discovered in German minister Hans Sutter's pocket instead, and Dane and Alex then settle down in Dane's hotel room to inspect illicitly obtained surveillance footage. This is entertaining in the immediate sense, but it is an extraordinary chain of evidence tampering and assumptions from a man whose assignment is to prevent an assassination. The book repeatedly tells us that Dane has excellent instincts. I would have preferred those instincts to be demonstrated through decisions that withstand five minutes of checking rather than serving as permission for him to trust whichever person the romance requires him to trust.

Alex is the stronger reason to keep reading. She has actually constructed a life around the consequences of what happened to her parents. She changes routes, uses false identities, speaks several languages, acquires combat training and keeps the flash drive physically close. When a masked gunman smashes through her balcony door, she knocks him over the railing, escapes her room, deliberately sends an elevator down while taking the stairs up, and goes to Dane because he is the only person nearby she has any reason to think might help. Those details give her caution a practical shape. I also liked that her revenge history is not cleaned up to make her conventionally innocent. She has killed members of the mercenary team connected to her parents' murders, and a corrupt former family friend dies after trying to dispose of her by a river. Dane discovering that she may be the assassin he was warned about gives the middle of the book its best tension. Unfortunately, that tension resolves remarkably quickly. Once he confronts her as Anya Federov, she produces the flash drive from her bra, explains what happened and essentially entrusts him with the problem. For a woman whose survival has depended on distrust for two years, the change is very convenient.

The romance follows the same accelerated timetable. Dane lets Alex stay in his room after the break-in, initially offers her the bed while he takes the floor, then they share the bed with pillows between them. They talk about their parents, lost ambitions and Dane's military past, although he is still lying about important parts of his identity. By the following stage those barriers are gone, both literally and otherwise, and the book gives them a long explicit sex scene followed the next morning by sex in the shower. I have no objection to explicit scenes, and Alex is allowed to state clearly what she wants. What I could not quite buy was the emotional weight attached to them. Within roughly a day and a half, she is already imagining what it would mean to lose Dane, while he is thinking that two days with her cannot possibly be enough. Attraction, certainly. Relief after prolonged isolation, certainly. A lasting trust strong enough to carry the ending needs more time than this book gives it. Readers who enjoy the compressed timetable of category-style romantic suspense will probably take that as part of the form. I kept noticing the elapsed hours.

The thriller finally becomes clearer once Alex is abducted during a bomb evacuation and taken to a Nord Stream facility in Germany. The reveal is that Sergei has been siphoning off natural gas, while Natalya Zotin, the sophisticated interpreter who has been hovering around the summit, controls ransomware and wants half of Sergei's proceeds. More importantly for Alex, Natalya admits that she ordered the attack that killed Alex's parents because they had stolen a copy of her software. I liked that several earlier observations about Natalya suddenly have a purpose. She knows everyone, watches everyone, appears wherever Russian officials gather and makes a point of following Alex. She has not simply been placed there to provoke jealousy or suspicion. Sergei and Natalya are each trying to profit from the same compromised system, and Alex's supposedly mysterious flash drive is directly connected to that operation. That is considerably more satisfying than discovering that the parents' deaths had no relationship to the summit plot at all.

Even there, however, the machinery is awfully accommodating. Charley has secretly had a tracking disc planted on Alex, can arrange aircraft, vehicles, another former SEAL, weapons and C4 at very short notice, and has people capable of copying the flash drive remotely while it is connected to Dane's laptop. When Natalya crushes the physical drive under her heel, this previously unmentioned copy means nothing essential has been lost. Dane and Adam then breach a German gas facility, rescue Alex, Natalya is shot dead, and everybody can depart in a Ferrari before flying back to the United States. Charley's almost unlimited resources are useful, but usefulness is not the same as a convincing operating structure. Whenever the characters require transport, intelligence, hacking or equipment, Charley appears able to provide it. That removes a fair amount of suspense because a problem does not necessarily require the characters to solve it themselves.

The one-month epilogue confirmed the book's priorities. The copied software has enabled the CIA cyber security team to restore the gas flow and protect systems against future attacks. Petrov has persuaded the summit participants to approve the pipeline, Alex has a new identity and a home in San Diego, and Dane is doing more work for Charley. Alex and Dane make love in her swimming pool shortly before friends are due, then he produces a ring and proposes. She accepts. I did smile at how thoroughly every loose practical and romantic requirement is completed in those few pages, but I did not believe a woman who spent two years trusting virtually nobody would plausibly go from meeting Dane to agreeing to marry him in about a month. That is the distinction that decides my recommendation. Shadow Assassin delivers the promised fantasy promptly: dangerous competent people, international stakes, sex, rescue, revenge completed and permanent love secured. Readers who regard that speed as a feature may have a good time. Readers who need trust, security procedures and major commitments to develop through evidence rather than narrative necessity are likely to find themselves checking the workings instead of enjoying the result.

Where they agreed

Daniel, James and Robert all read the book as being about trust rather than about the pipeline. Robert notes that almost everybody is working under a false name, withholding information, or judging somebody on incomplete evidence, and that the secrecy keeps changing meaning. Daniel and Sarah credit the same grounding detail: Dane has been dishonourably discharged, cannot get security work, is flipping hamburgers and close to eviction, which makes accepting a suspicious package more believable than curiosity would have been.

Where they split

David stopped at chapter five, forty years of civil engineering making it impossible to accept a smashed glass balcony door at a high-security summit that nobody notices. Oliver stopped at nine, where Alex spends the night in Dane's room and then returns to work at the Energy Summit as though an attempted murder were a standard hazard of the job. Emily and Sarah both finished and enjoyed it while saying plainly it does not survive being thought about for longer than it takes to read. Ashley's line is the narrowest: once the leads sleep together, the mystery stops being a mystery.

Written from the reviews above and checked by an RNKD editor against what the readers actually wrote. It adds nothing they did not say. How Roundtables work

Report an error on this page How we review Cover image rights