Very effective when it investigates, less convincing when it performs

Avi Mizrahi, 61
16 reviews on RNKD · 8 min read
SPOILERS This review discusses the whole book, including how it ends.
I would recommend Perfect Remains, but with conditions. If you want a fast, graphic serial-killer thriller where the police have to work backwards from deliberately misleading evidence, there is plenty here that works. If detailed torture bothers you, or if you lose patience when detectives become unusually dramatic people with unusually dramatic private lives, I would choose something else. This review discusses the killer, the victims who survive, and the ending, because the main reason I ended up with this mixed verdict is in how the investigation actually works.
The strongest thing in the book is Reginald King's method. We know from the beginning that he is the killer, so this is not a conventional question of identifying the murderer alongside the police. King kidnaps accomplished women, keeps them alive in a concealed section of his house, then murders other women and arranges the remains to convince police that his real captives are dead. Elaine Buxton's blood, tooth and scarf point towards the burned body in the Cairngorms. Later Jayne Magee's teeth and clothes support the identification of remains dissolved in sodium hydroxide. The evidence is real. The conclusion drawn from it is false. That distinction kept me reading.
I liked the investigation most when Callanach stopped asking what evidence had been left and started asking why it had been left. This is a practical question. At the Cairngorm bothy, a baseball bat is supposedly hidden but still discoverable, Elaine's tooth is nearby, and a piece of bloodied scarf survives beneath a stone. The scarf eventually matters because its edges are frayed rather than burned. It did not accidentally survive a fire. Someone prepared it for discovery. The same logic applies to the trolley discarded at Granton Harbour. King appears meticulous everywhere else, so why suddenly become careless at exactly those points where the police need evidence identifying a victim? Once Callanach says, in effect, that there are no mistakes here, the case becomes much more interesting.
That appealed to me because errors leave patterns. When somebody is careful through ten stages and apparently careless at the eleventh, I want to know whether the eleventh stage was really an error. Fields makes good use of this. The polished shoes seen by a witness also become useful. Professor Edwin Harris, the profiler imposed on Callanach, largely brushes that detail aside. Callanach later wears smooth-soled smart shoes back at the Cairngorm site and sees how little trace they leave compared with Salter's hiking boots. That is the kind of detection I enjoyed: take a detail, test it against the physical situation, and see whether the explanation still stands.
Harris provides the useful opposite. He decides the crimes are fundamentally sexual, assumes an escalating sexual offender, and constructs a profile around that theory. The police then find Rory Hand, a convicted rapist who enjoys the crime photographs and eventually confesses. The trouble is that his reaction to those photographs shows surprise before excitement. Callanach sees it. Hand knows about the case from the media and wants access to its horrors, but that is different from having committed the murders. Harris and Lively are so invested in getting a result that they nearly turn their assumptions into proof. When Hand cannot supply information about when and where he killed the women, the structure collapses. This part is a good warning about an investigation becoming too pleased with its own explanation.
Fields does not rely only on that large reversal. Smaller operational details repeatedly move the case. A witness notices a wheelie suitcase. Callanach tests whether a woman of Jayne's size can fit inside one by making his officers try it. Chloroform on Jayne's phone supports the kidnapping theory. The timing of its effects narrows what the abductor could have done before reaching his vehicle. A log book at an outdoor centre preserves names and registration numbers from lone hikers. Scrap-yard records, an old registration and finally Louis Jones lead towards the temporary vehicles King uses. None of these things solves the case alone. I prefer that to a detective suddenly having one brilliant revelation unsupported by the work that came before it.
There is, however, a great deal of ugliness to get through. Fields spends long stretches inside King's head while he removes teeth, beats feet with a ruler, pushes a needle beneath a fingernail, tortures Grace and eventually kills her by forcing chess pieces into her throat. Later Billie, only fourteen, has her throat cut while hanging upside down. These scenes are not coy. King constantly explains his cruelty to himself as education, discipline, improvement or necessity. That does establish his character. His self-image depends on converting sadism and resentment into evidence of intellectual superiority. But I did not need every demonstration at the length provided. After a point, the mechanism was established and another extended torture scene gave me more revulsion without much more understanding.
King himself is more effective when Fields concentrates on the small hypocrisies. He insists he is disciplined while repeatedly losing control. He calls himself intellectually exceptional while purchasing a dubious doctorate and resenting people with legitimate academic careers. He believes he is selecting women for their minds, yet he cannot tolerate disagreement. He regards himself as morally above sexual violence while degrading women and using threats of rape as control. Even his careful procedures contain vanity. The polished shoes are part of a ritual telling him he is properly prepared. His talking to himself, which he does when stressed, is finally one of the few uncontrolled clues he leaves. That all fits together.
The book is less disciplined with Luc Callanach. I liked him as an investigator much more than I liked the amount of material devoted to establishing how exceptional he is. He is a former Interpol agent, French-Scottish, extremely handsome, previously a model, an experienced skydiver, multilingual, good with frightened children, and damaged by a false rape allegation that destroyed his former life. Individual parts could work. Piled together, they started to feel designed. The narration even tells us early that his face could stop traffic and that being so attractive is a burden. I do not need that information repeated in various forms to understand a detective.
His personal history also produces one of the sections where my patience weakened most. Callanach goes skydiving because the case has overwhelmed him, flirts with Penny, gets sexual with her, discovers that his trauma still prevents him responding physically, and on a later jump deliberately delays opening his parachute until the automatic device saves him at 750 feet. This is serious material, and the novel does eventually connect it to the damage caused by Astrid Borde's accusation. But in the middle of an already elaborate serial-killer investigation, it felt like a second thriller was being installed inside the first. Then Astrid herself appears in Edinburgh, working in police finance, stalking Callanach, sending roses and champagne, and issuing Ava a death threat because she is jealous. Again, one complication becomes several.
Ava Turner worked better for me. She is funny without becoming incompetent, challenges Callanach when his management style is poor, and contributes useful thinking to the case. Her suggestion that they look first at the killer's ordinary personality rather than an abstract murderer helps Callanach understand the obsessive planning. Their developing friendship has some good scenes, particularly because Ava refuses to treat him as either an exotic Frenchman or a damaged object requiring constant handling. I did think the repeated material about Callanach's attractiveness and the possibility of romance became too obvious, especially by the final joke about whether Steve McQueen is better looking. Still, I believed the working partnership.
I am more divided on Ava's separate investigation into the abandoned babies. It eventually uncovers St Gerard Majella's, where pregnant girls have been confined, denied meaningful choices and physically punished. Felicity Costello is particularly effective because the case begins with a DNA result apparently identifying her twin Lucy, then moves through the identical-twin discrepancy to Felicity. Her interview with Callanach gives the investigation an emotional centre without needing a murderer's theatrics. The discovery that the girls made a pact to abandon their babies in order to expose what was happening is grim and memorable. But Ava's press statement condemning the Roman Catholic Church at large is written at such a temperature that the resulting suspension feels engineered partly to put her alone where King can abduct her. The machinery of the plot becomes visible.
That happens again near the end. The final chain is clever in outline. Callanach realises the cyclist's remembered phrase was not about going back to “the lane” at all, but about taking Jayne “back to Elaine.” From there, the possibility that Elaine is alive changes everything. Grace Smith's disappearance supplies a likely corpse double, and the witness descriptions connect through the mothball smell. Natasha then remembers that her administrator Reginald King attended or knew of public lectures by the women. Suddenly the ordinary university employee previously sitting near the edge of events moves into focus. This is satisfying because details planted much earlier finally have jobs to do.
At the same time, some of the police procedure requires generosity from the reader. Callanach takes Natasha directly to King's house before he has proper backup because he lacks formal grounds and fears losing the women. She predictably approaches the house herself. They enter through the garage, follow fresh blood, discover the concealed staircase and reach King while he is threatening his captives. It is exciting, certainly, but by then I was less interested in whether the scene was exciting than in whether these experienced people were making sensible decisions. Fields often chooses the more dramatic option.
The rescue itself is appropriately messy rather than triumphant. Billie dies before they can save her. Ava survives, as do Elaine and Jayne. Callanach uses a taser on King, and Elaine then asks whether she deserves something after what he has done. Callanach cannot officially permit retaliation, but silently indicates one blow. She drives the hammer into King's mouth and destroys his teeth. I understand the symmetry, and after hundreds of pages in King's company I certainly did not feel sorry for him. Still, I preferred the investigation's harder questions about evidence and responsibility to this neat piece of vengeance. It is satisfying in the immediate sense and less interesting morally than it first appears.
So the quantity at the end is clear enough. There is a strong procedural thriller here, especially in the planted evidence, the false identifications, the wheelie-case reconstruction, the mistakes in Harris's profile, and Callanach's eventual decision to investigate King's preparation rather than follow his staged clues. There is also a more sensational novel wrapped around it, full of extreme violence, highly dramatic personal histories and convenient collisions between the detectives' private lives and the case. Readers who enjoy dark, explicit serial-killer fiction and do not mind that combination will probably move through it very quickly. Readers wanting restrained violence, ordinary detectives or strict realism in police behaviour may find the excess distracting. I finished because I wanted to see whether the evidence against Elaine and Jayne would be correctly dismantled. That part earned my attention. The rest is why my recommendation comes with conditions.








